Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1463

reference
97-tree-1
name
1463
tree-preservation-order

undefined

97-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.002807 50.859785)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.002751 50.859779,-1.002753 50.859790,-1.002761 50.859800,-1.002773 50.859808,-1.002789 50.859814,-1.002807 50.859816,-1.002824 50.859814,-1.002840 50.859809,-1.002853 50.859801,-1.002861 50.859791,-1.002864 50.859780,-1.002862 50.859769,-1.002854 50.859759,-1.002841 50.859751,-1.002826 50.859746,-1.002808 50.859744,-1.002791 50.859745,-1.002775 50.859750,-1.002762 50.859758,-1.002754 50.859768,-1.002751 50.859779)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL